Editorial Policy

Start with the entity

Similar spellings do not prove that two websites or apps belong to the same operator. Before describing a destination as official, we look for evidence connecting the brand, publisher, operating entity and market. Historical authorisation records are labelled as historical. An accessible website or an HTTPS certificate alone is not proof of identity or current permission.

Match the article to its evidence

Source-based analysis explains published records and their limits. An editorial review adds an assessment of documented features and terms. A hands-on test requires a real record of the device, date, process and observations. A user rating requires genuine user evidence. We do not turn an editor's opinion into a fabricated aggregate score or imply that a file was tested when it was not.

Keep task pages focused

An app guide answers an app question; an account-access guide answers an access question. They should not hide a different commercial action behind a misleading title. Sources and a review date sit alongside the information they support. A revised timestamp should reflect a meaningful check or change, not an automatic daily refresh.

Commercial links and corrections

Any commercial relationship must be made visible where it matters. It does not justify unsupported claims, favourable factual changes or the removal of material limits. Send corrections to [email protected] with the article address and supporting source. We assess the evidence and amend the affected material when the correction is supported.

A paid placement is separate from the answer

A guide must answer the task for the brand it names. Advertising is labelled separately and does not replace an app source, login guide or support reference. Documentary references retain the identity of their original source. We do not publish a bonus amount, exclusive code or overall winner without the evidence needed to support that claim.

Author credit and source images

The A5game editorial desk byline identifies the collective editorial work published by this website. Its link opens our publisher information; the review-method link explains the evidence standard. A review date records a content check, rather than an automatic promise that every linked service was tested that day.

App icons, promotional artwork and interface images are identified as source material. Their captions and alternative text describe what they show. A source-provided image does not establish our own installation, login or account experience. Resizing or converting a source image does not change that distinction.

For an image or factual correction, include the article address, the disputed item and a source supporting the change. Send rights concerns through the website contact route with enough detail to identify the material.